I’ve seen that one and read the fine print, you’d notice that it is about more specifically sex workers - anything to do with digital entertainment (animations, drawings, 3D animations, writing, video-games) seems to be put there as an afterthought. If you think cautiously about that document, it does not look like this is about protecting artists, it just puts a reference there to sucker in strays. The higher emphasis on sex workers should tell you what its actual goal is.
If you watch the video I posted, as well as the petition, you’ll understand that the companies are not targeting live-action stuff. Not only have they left only-fans alone, the video shows a response the leader of Collective Shout made about “Cuties”. Spoiler alert: she don’t care. In fact, she even defended that film. A movie infamous for its depiction of actual children.
Extra - that video also brings up how its gotten attention of other individuals outside of our community. If I weigh the odds, I know who I want to throw my hat in with, and it’s not the one where - when you look at the fine print - is actually not going against them at all.
I can guarantee that if people sign that petition, it’ll only hand the victory over - the greater focus is on allowing sex workers, which companies have had no problems, so it is not actual a problem they’d have. It’s the biggest loophole in plain sight, it allows companies to haggle to “we’ll just leave the sex work alone, you simply can’t have fictional depictions of it.” Thus, they can make it seem like they’ve changed while actually doing nothing but continueing their goal.