yeah. One of two things would cause that: Payment processors making another pass with a more extreme demand (not exactly unlikely), or Itch decides it wants to increase revenue (which would also probably come with forcing everyone to accept payment, and therefore run afoul of the existing rules)
3 Likes
neither of us support collective shout
More bad newsâŚ
Even if you somehow think this guy is political, at least watch the damn video.
Edit: those of you trying to say, âit was bad stuff that got removed, so itâs okayâ, you need to start thinking about it like they do in âThe Good, The Bad, and The Uglyâ: there are two kinds of people in this world.
For this battle, thereâre two kinds of people right now: those who value their freedom of speech and expression, and those who seek to control you. There is no room for âat leastsâ, there is no room for âbut this was already badâ, there is no room for âit wonât happen to meâ. If any of your logic follows these lines, think very, very, very carefully, and even force yourself to consider how this crusade can affect you. Consider how any of it can go wrong.
Because if left alone, it will. We are nothing but peasants who must obey those that are starting this. If these problems get far enough that they might affect you, then by then it is already too late. By then, we are already someone vomiting from radiation sickness - seeing signs of poison when itâs already too late.
3 Likes
yeah I saw that too. Iâm a little less worried about that one going through, as a bill like that shows up all the time in US congress but it never goes anywhere.
Still though, with how fast and sudden everything else is, definitely keep an eye on it. Makes it all the more important the UK one is resisted as much as possible.
2 Likes
The problem is that now thereâs precedent. Texas apparently was able to pass a similar law sometime ago, despite it going against the constitution.
2 Likes
Itâs sad that the West is becoming authoritarian, wether itâs France, UK, EU⌠and now the US.
1 Like
Bro someone reported the fucking meme Lmaoo 
This is linked in the article I was referring to, which contradicts what you said. They also claim they were not tagged NSFW and had no erotic content. People in the comments are saying the same happened to them. I mean, you can claim theyâre lying if youâd like, though.
Edit: I misremembered, itâs linked in the comments of that article. Oops.
1 Like
Nothing, as far as I can tell, was actually âtaken downâ, nor does that post state or imply that any creators were permanently banned. They were delisted, same as anything else - the post youâre quoting offered no specific evidence that takedowns were happening, the one person in the replies who commented firsthand that their work was affected confirmed in another post that they had marked that content as adult and it was simply hidden from search, and a days-old comment asking specifically for confirmation that actual takedowns were happening was met with complete silence.
To be fair there IS some overlap on the Venn diagram between âqueer creatorsâ and âcreators whoâve had pages removed and/or payouts disabled due to the new ban on rape/incest contentâ, but again thatâs not (yet) targeted at queer creators specifically. From what I can tell, payments being disabled is also on a per-title basis, not per-account, but thereâs so much hysteria and misinformation being spread around that itâs difficult to find actual facts rather than hearsay.
2 Likes
Oh, right.
I didnât see anything else I could confirm except the one I was able to see myself. ExpandingUniverseâs game Hypnosis was taken down. Both the free version and a paid version are still listed on their page on Itch, but when you click them youâll see a message about the page being suspended and the takedown notice:
And this is likely assumed based on the ânewâ rules for consent. Ignoring the fact that hypnosis requires ongoing consent from start to finish. But payment processors apparently either refuse to research that, or just donât give a flying fuck. And considering this has been powered by right-wing anti-porn groups⌠it really could be either way.
Anyway, I donât know about mass takedowns, I canât find anything to definitely prove it beyond delisting, but content removal (well, suspensions) are definitely true.
Maybe that helps?
(Edit: I can still download them, as I bought these, since doing otherwise would likely violate some laws. But new purchases canât be made etc, as you can see.)
4 Likes
Im going to drop this here for those who may be interested, but Hoeg Law did a video with their analysis of the situation. He obviously feels very strongly on this issue, but I have always enjoyed his legal analysis and thought the video was well thought out with lots of good information.
4 Likes
If you want to help, please Protect Queer Creators and Sex Workers - Tell Payment Processors to STOP (yellat.money)
Also I would like to remind you about Patreonâs Policy Page from March 12th, 2024.
Promoting, normalizing, providing instructional advice about, coordinating, or otherwise glorifying disordered eating, feederism, or related topics is prohibited on Patreon.
[âŚ]
Examples of feederism works include, but are not limited to: force feeding (consensual or nonconsensual), using illegal or controlled substances to achieve weight gain, using devices to fill the stomach, and so forth.
Thatâs us! To anyone who was âoh this, that, and the other should be banned so this is goodâ itâs you! they are banning you!
First they create the circle around which is âgoodâ content, and then they make the circle smaller and smaller. Patreon was able to either push back against this or get further clarification from their lawyers about what exactly payment processors are disallow so for now the above example was no longer applied.
But this does not change the fact that we were banned for a few months and someday, some way some moral concern group focusing on Eating Disorders is going to throw us out flat on our asses unless we protect free expression.
Money doesnât get an opinion on how it is spent!
10 Likes
â Badly wordedâ is actually a bad sign. The more vague something is written, the more you gotta question what theyâre not saying. Contracting and legal terms 101.
4 Likes
I donât care if you people hate this guy, or if you somehow think heâs of a political extreme, just watch this to get a full understanding of where everyone stands:
This is all news pertinent to us.
When I search google for itchio takedowns specifically because of recent changes, using unique language from the current takedown notice and using the search operator (site:itch.io/takedowns/), I can find 153 unique takedown notices.
But there are certainly more that havenât indexed yet, and more works probably will probably be taken down as itchio works its way through their library
4 Likes
to be fair to Itch, those may have been actually things that violated TOS. They are currently auditing and going through a review process at the moment. Very real chance that 153 actual TOS violating items could have been found during the last 4 days.
unless Iâm misunderstanding this post
1 Like
I searched using an excerpt from this notice:
so Iâm making the assumption that all of the takedowns were specifically because of the recent TOS changes, though I canât say whether any specific game would have been violating itchioâs previous TOS.
2 Likes
Echoing @2-36, and their takedown notices are identical, just a template applied, so they make the creator check the FAQ section linked to see what was violating the TOS
Just a quick update from a creator with 10 games listed on Itch⌠None of mine have been removed, but none of mine are listed under Adult tags still, so theyâre still active but de-indexed.
Iâm not sure how Itch is prioritizing their review of games, but some transparency to creators would be appreciated. Thatâs likely asking too much though - it could open them to lawsuits - so I get it, but am disappointed at it all the same.
I look forward to this all blowing over. Iâm optimistic it will, but for now⌠
7 Likes